I just finished reading this article in the Wall Street Journal regarding spelling reform, and I am flabbergasted! However, not for the reasons you may expect. My shock is not due to the fact that there are people in the world trying to change spelling, but because I have been well-acquainted with the spelling reform movement nearly all of my life, but never expected its efforts to make the front page of a national newspaper!
Let me explain. My dad is a member of The Spelling Society (formerly the Simplified Spelling Society). I remember one time he brought home a prototype version of The Wizard Of Oz written in simplified spelling for me to read. Though I understand the intentions behind it, to ask an 11-year-old bookworm to unlearn her understanding of her native language is quite a challenge. The Tin Woodman became the "Tin Wuudman" and the yellow brick road was a "yelo brik rode" instead. It was near impossible to remember to connect these foreign phrases to the meanings I knew they were supposed to represent. I read it stubbornly and judged it rather harshly, but the truth was that I got the story all the same.
Simplified spelling has been in my life for such a long time that it is difficult for me to take a stance on it. I love studying etymology, doing crossword puzzles, and writing or reading poetry that is as visually interesting as it is aurally. But plenty of intelligent people simply have a block against spelling rules. This doesn't make their thoughts any less valid, yet their intelligence is often questioned unfairly as a result.
I intended to make a post of substance regarding the issue of spelling, but if I'm going to be honest here, the real reason I got excited about this article is because it describes a world that I am a part of. My dad has been a protester at the national spelling bee, which I find hilarious and awesome. The article has a section (and a cool trademark Wall Street Journal ink pen face) about 102-year-old Ed Rondthaler and his house in New York State. Well, kids, call this my brush with fame, because I have eaten lunch at the Rondthaler house on a drive back from New York City with my dad. Mr. Rondthaler showed me a flashcard show about the inanity of English spelling--how "comb" should rhyme with "tomb" but "tomb" rhymes with "boom" and "comb" rhymes with "roam" and "home" instead. Other names mentioned in the print version of the article--Alan Mole, Joe Little are names that have appeared in our mailbox for years.
Maybe the reason I'm excited is because this little constant of my life that has always seemed pretty hopeless is at least being recognized. Spelling reformers face the fact that they are not likely to achieve the success they want, but stay determined in spite of it all.
Next up: my life with Esperanto, worm compost, carnivorous plants and historic canals. Ok, not really.